I tried an evo on two different shares by two different group members on 691. One required 138 points to evo and the 2nd one required 209 points to evo. The required score on the last one I tried is higher than the group high by 146.
I did find one share that evo'd with the normal 2 points. But, 2 out of 3 requiring very high score appears to be a bug.
Sorry for not replying earlier but we are looking into this.
Hi smilingone,
I'm looking into this issue. Could you please post another comment in this feedback, providing both the group member's name and the solution name for the two shared solutions which required very high scores to evo. Thanks!
pvc78 share of 15555.682 requires 15693
bertro share of 15708.284 requires 15917
bertro share of 15814.891 requires 15917
bertro share of 16288.205 requires 16611
I just stopped my client to get this info for you. I wanted to make sure those shares were still in place. Btw, one of bertro's shares is unevo'd. We just wanted to experiment with it.
The share that requires 16611 is still unevo'd at 16618. And, the high group is 16435.
I was at 16435.882 when I stopped my client and shared that score to group since it is the highest showing for group. Upon opening a new client and using the same track my high is now 16355. I even downloaded my share of 16435 and it changed to 16355. I disabled the filter to see if that would give me the 16435 back. That ended up with an unevo'd 16664.379. There's nothing I can do to get the 16435 back and this has been a constant problem with this puzzle.
This issue takes the fun out of the game.
Probable cause: the score with filters off was higher then the score with filters on. And that score is remembered for evoing.
Related generic topic (with solutions and latest status)
http://fold.it/portal/node/994817
Duplicate topics:
http://fold.it/portal/node/994798
http://fold.it/portal/node/994811
http://fold.it/portal/node/994750
=> I close this discussion here despite of the beautiful smile of the author.
Devs requested info and actively working this case. Why close?
I thought of that timo… however, it isn't that simple. It didn't evo after meeting the required score. I work with the filters on due to the note by Baker: http://fold.it/portal/node/994822
This is a discussion about evo issues that the devs are working on after getting requested information. Let's the devs close it when they are done.
assigning, tjbertram is looking into these (and related) issues