alcor29 Lv 1
Do you use filters when you send some "ideal" design to Rosetta?
Next Science Chat March 28
Started by inkycatz
Skippysk8s Lv 1
As we US citizens know, funding is getting tougher and tougher. What can we do to help – time, energy, tech support, whatever
We'd like to know. Really
Susume Lv 1
In the recent blog comments, bkoep mentions that the box plots about improvement in "top scoring solutions" are based on the top 10 solo and evo solutions per puzzle. Was 10 the cutoff just for those graphs, or is that a cutoff you use for sending things to Rosetta as well? I'm wondering, if my best solution finishes at rank 11-30, will you for sure look at it, or do I need to share that best one with scientists as well as my lower-scoring tracks?
Skippysk8s Lv 1
As we US citizens know, funding is getting tougher and tougher. What can we do to help – time, energy, tech support, whatever
We'd like to know. Really
Bruno Kestemont Lv 1
Do you use filters when you send some "ideal" design to Rosetta?
Bruno Kestemont Lv 1
Is it really worthwhile to submit to scientists a fold which is only r50? Bearing in mind that r50 might only be 200 energy points from r1 in some cases and in other cases 2000 points lower than r1. Also some r50s may be just rough folds with no refinement while others may just represent an unstable fold?