I understand than there is some false positives, and BUNS objective malus are lower,
but I dont think it is good to have so mush top score solutions with 12 BUNS.
I have a suggestion maybe to fix this : a progressive malus score system.
Like :
1 BUNS : -20 points
2 BUNS : -40 points
3 BUNS : -70 points
4 BUNS : -100 points
5 BUNS : -150 points
6 BUNS : -200 points
7 BUNS : -300 points
Tell me what you think about this (or if there is other problems if we do this ?)
Thanks.
Another alternative would be a uniquely calculated penalty per BUN, based on how deep it is in the protein or aggregate. BUNS closer to the edge could have a smaller penalty than those deeper in the core (with a hover tooltip showing the penalty for each). That would definitely help us prioritize which ones we need to focus on.
A 200 of 500 BUNS score could be a (-20) and a (-280) penalty, or two BUNS of (-150) each…
I would upvote both of these… if that feature hadn't been trashed.
The entire reason for voting was to flag to the Admins/staff that the topic was important enough to give immediate attention.
And now we can't. Which means great suggestions will likely be lost in a sea of lesser ones.