Placeholder image of a protein
Icon representing a puzzle

412: Electron Density Trace Puzzle

Closed since almost 15 years ago

Intermediate Overall Prediction

Summary


Created
April 16, 2011
Expires
Max points
100
Description

This Rosetta model was generated by trying to fit an electron density map, but as you can see the resulting trace looks pretty bad. We have tried various Rosetta protocols on this model but they aren't able to make it look any better, so we are hoping your human skills can spot what areas need to be improved the most.

Top groups


  1. Avatar for Contenders 100 pts. 12,243
  2. Avatar for Anthropic Dreams 2. Anthropic Dreams 82 pts. 12,235
  3. Avatar for Pauling's Pitbulls 3. Pauling's Pitbulls 66 pts. 12,139
  4. Avatar for Slovak National Team 4. Slovak National Team 53 pts. 11,817
  5. Avatar for Void Crushers 5. Void Crushers 42 pts. 11,676
  6. Avatar for Go Science 6. Go Science 33 pts. 11,517
  7. Avatar for foldeRNA 7. foldeRNA 26 pts. 11,422
  8. Avatar for L'Alliance Francophone 8. L'Alliance Francophone 20 pts. 11,388
  9. Avatar for Russian team 9. Russian team 15 pts. 11,379
  10. Avatar for Natural Abilities 10. Natural Abilities 11 pts. 11,044

  1. Avatar for PRL 81. PRL Lv 1 20 pts. 10,641
  2. Avatar for Xyaneon 82. Xyaneon Lv 1 19 pts. 10,556
  3. Avatar for krulon 83. krulon Lv 1 19 pts. 10,475
  4. Avatar for Deleted player 84. Deleted player pts. 10,417
  5. Avatar for Acheron Hades 85. Acheron Hades Lv 1 18 pts. 10,368
  6. Avatar for chemistsrule 86. chemistsrule Lv 1 17 pts. 10,354
  7. Avatar for shettler 87. shettler Lv 1 17 pts. 10,351
  8. Avatar for NinjaGreg 88. NinjaGreg Lv 1 17 pts. 10,336
  9. Avatar for Dolichwier 89. Dolichwier Lv 1 16 pts. 10,306
  10. Avatar for cbwest 90. cbwest Lv 1 16 pts. 10,283

Comments


Rav3n_pl Lv 1

to optimize it or make own folds?
Make totally fifferent aligement or "just" optimize existing one?

Origami314 Lv 1

I looked up Electron Density Trace and I got the impression that the method predicts where each AA probably is with some margin for error. So, does that mean we should try not to change their locations too much? Is there any chance you can show us the original results with the probabilities?

beta_helix Staff Lv 1

Indeed, the data indicates that this model is close to the native geometrically but you can see that it needs a lot of work and optimization.

So drastic restructuring moves should not be necessary, but finding the native low-energy well should still be a challenge!

I will see if we can provide you with some of the experimental data, if not on this puzzle we can try it with future puzzles.