bkoep Staff Lv 1
Perhaps for future CASP we could have a function to evaluate a solution (I suppose it would be too slow at runtime instead of the current energy score), with similar params than CASP uses, to know if we are doing well
CASP11 Results!
Started by bkoep
spmm Lv 1
There is a 'Finder Table' for CASP 11 in the new CASP wiki section, quickly find a target and see which puzzles it appeared in and vica versa:
Bletchley Park Lv 1
Congratulations to all teams, CASP was hard work !
BitSpawn Lv 1
Perhaps for future CASP we could have a function to evaluate a solution (I suppose it would be too slow at runtime instead of the current energy score), with similar params than CASP uses, to know if we are doing well
bkoep Staff Lv 1
If I understand you correctly, BitSpawn, the problem with using CASP quality metrics (like GDT_HA) is that they all measure "similarity to native." And, of course, the native structure is unknown to us while the target is open!
There are perhaps other inconsistencies that we could work on. For example, we learned this year that the CASP organizers defined "contacts" a little differently than we did, so we could change the way we score contact-assisted puzzles.