Crash using filter.GetBonus("Exploration")

Started by bertro

bertro Lv 1

In a Partition puzzle, a recipe with this single line:

print(filter.GetBonus("Exploration"))

will crash the client everytime with:

log.txt:

UNHANDLED EXCEPTION
1: interactive::util::FilterResultCacheable::get_result_bonus_value +57 bytes (no line)
2: standalone::application::luaV2_filter_GetBonus +368 bytes (no line)
3: luaD_precall +425 bytes (no line)
4: luaV_execute +3242 bytes (no line)
5: luaD_call +99 bytes (no line)
6: lua_call +83 bytes (no line)
7: luaD_rawrunprotected +76 bytes (no line)
8: luaD_pcall +53 bytes (no line)
9: lua_pcall +93 bytes (no line)
10: interactive::application::shared::lua::LuaScripter::exec_string +93 bytes (no line)
11: interactive::application::shared::lua::LuaExec::on_exec +88 bytes (no line)
12: boost::detail::function::void_function_obj_invoker0<boost::_bi::bind_t<void,boost::_mfi::mf1<void,interactive::application::shared::lua::LuaExec,std::basic_string<char,std::char_traits,std::allocator > const &>,boost::_bi::list2<boost::_bi::value<interactive::application::shared::lua::LuaExec *>,boost::_bi::value<std::basic_string<char,std::char_traits,std::allocator > > > >,void>::invoke +22 bytes (no line) 13: boost::function0::operator() +120 bytes (no line) 14: interactive::util::Thread::thread_entry_func +69 bytes (no line) 15: interactive::util::Thread::win32_thread_startup_helper +11 bytes (no line) 16: BaseThreadInitThunk +36 bytes (no line) 17: RtlValidSecurityDescriptor +282 bytes (no line) 18: RtlValidSecurityDescriptor +234 bytes (no line)

Susume Lv 1

You are trying to get the value of a bonus that does not exist. Exploration is not a score bonus in these puzzles; it is a condition (yes/no). Try this:

print(filter.ConditionSatisfied("Exploration"))

Admittedly, the game should just put a lua error in the script output rather than crashing!

bertro Lv 1

Could we get this bug/crash function working?

Even if it is not technically a "bonus", it could help in identifying if our solutions are far enough from original and direct recipes…

Thanks

rmoretti Staff Lv 1

Exactly or return the value of 'Explored' (which would be useful in itself).

Please notice that if you interrogate filter.GetNames(), it will return "Exploration" as a valid FilterName.

And this works (except the last line obviously):

FilterNames = filter.GetNames()

if #FilterNames > 0 then
print("There are filter in this puzzle:")
for i=1,#FilterNames do
msg = " '"..FilterNames[i].."' is "
state = "DISABLED"
if filter.IsEnabled(FilterNames[i]) then state = "ENABLED" end
msg = msg..state.." and the condition is "
condition = "NOT MET"
if filter.ConditionSatisfied(FilterNames[i]) then condition = "MET" end
msg = msg..condition
print(msg)
–print(" with a score of "..filter.GetBonus(FilterNames[i])) –this crashes the client 09/23/2018
end
end

jeff101 Lv 1

Can you make a LUA command to get the RMSD value for a structure,
like the RMSD values reported in the Score Window in the recent
Partition Function Puzzles? Then we can use this LUA command in
Recipes to record, report, & optimize based on the RMSD value.