Placeholder image of a protein
Icon representing a puzzle

1894: Symmetric Trimer Design: H-bond Networks

Closed since over 5 years ago

Intermediate Overall Design Symmetry

Summary

Created
September 24, 2020
Expires
Max points
100
Description

Design a symmetric protein trimer, with 3 identical chains that assemble together! Note the Interaction Energy Objective, which will penalize poorly-scoring large residues that can lead to unwanted protein aggregation. The H-bond Network Objective encourages players to build buried, satisfied H-bond networks at the interface between symmetric chains. H-bond networks are a great way to introduce polar residues at the interface, but it's important that all of the bondable atoms make hydrogen bonds! We've also adjusted the H-bond Network Objective so that poor-scoring H-bonds may not contribute to networks; poor-scoring H-bonds will be displayed in red. This puzzle uses the Buried Unsats Objective, with a large penalty for buried polar atoms that can't make H-bonds. In this puzzle, there are no limits on the Complex Core, but we've included the Complex Core objective so players can see the core residues that can be incorporated into H-bond Networks.

Top groups

  1. Avatar for Contenders
    1. Contenders
    100 pts. 21,124
  2. Avatar for Gargleblasters 2. Gargleblasters 74 pts. 20,899
  3. Avatar for Beta Folders 3. Beta Folders 54 pts. 20,783
  4. Avatar for Go Science 4. Go Science 38 pts. 20,696
  5. Avatar for Anthropic Dreams 5. Anthropic Dreams 27 pts. 19,836
  6. Avatar for Void Crushers 6. Void Crushers 18 pts. 19,316
  7. Avatar for Hold My Beer 7. Hold My Beer 12 pts. 18,929
  8. Avatar for Marvin's bunch 8. Marvin's bunch 8 pts. 18,929
  9. Avatar for L'Alliance Francophone 9. L'Alliance Francophone 5 pts. 18,805
  10. Avatar for Russian team 10. Russian team 3 pts. 17,084
  1. Avatar for robgee 21. robgee Lv 1 39 pts. 19,322
  2. Avatar for spdenne 22. spdenne Lv 1 37 pts. 19,316
  3. Avatar for Bletchley Park 23. Bletchley Park Lv 1 35 pts. 19,265
  4. Avatar for Deleted player 24. Deleted player pts. 19,135
  5. Avatar for mirp 25. mirp Lv 1 32 pts. 19,027
  6. Avatar for drumpeter18yrs9yrs 26. drumpeter18yrs9yrs Lv 1 30 pts. 18,985
  7. Avatar for Vinara 27. Vinara Lv 1 28 pts. 18,949
  8. Avatar for John McLeod 28. John McLeod Lv 1 27 pts. 18,940
  9. Avatar for Todd6485577 29. Todd6485577 Lv 1 25 pts. 18,929
  10. Avatar for jausmh 30. jausmh Lv 1 24 pts. 18,929

Comments

bkoep Staff Lv 1

Buried Unsats (max +500)
Penalizes polar atoms that cannot make hydrogen bonds, -150 points per atom (not including symmetric copies).

Core Existence: Monomer (max +2200)
Ensures that at least 22 residues are buried in the core of the monomer unit.

Core: Complex (max +0)
Awards no bonuses or penalties. Click Show to see which residues count as "Core" for the H-bond Network objective.

H-bond Network (max +1800)
Rewards networks that comprise at least 2 H-bonds involving core residues.
Between 1 and 9 H-bonds should cross the interface between symmetric units.
Networks must be at least 75% satisfied (i.e. 75% of all bondable atoms in a network must make a H-bond).

SS Design (max +500)
Penalizes all CYS residues. Penalizes GLY, ALA residues in sheets. Penalizes GLY, ALA in helices.

Ideal Loops (max +500)
Penalizes any loop region that does not match one of the Building Blocks in the Blueprint tool. Use "Auto Structures" to see which regions of your protein count as loops.

Formula350 Lv 1

So I won't ping you over Discord :P
However, we're all getting an error, even with the latest update:

downloading: http://fold.it/portal/files/puzzle_pdb/puzzle_post_2053.zip has key .ocmdline has key .sym has key .roscript TASKOPERATIONS SCOREFXNS FILTERS MOVERS APPLY_TO_POSE PROTOCOLS has key .owts Exception: Both weights file and score function name supplied. in ..\..\..\source\src\standalone\application\boinc\Puzzle.cc line 1403

bkoep Staff Lv 1

Thanks! Should be fixed.

Also, the September 23 update is required to open this puzzle.

spvincent Lv 1

Since the changes to H-Bond Network scoring a few puzzles ago, which were largely aimed at preventing serine triangles and similar constructs, I've found it a lot harder to create networks of any kind. If this means that the new version reflects reality better than so be it, but I can't help wondering if the changes may have been too restrictive.

bkoep Staff Lv 1

It's hard to make blanket conclusions about all H-bond networks. But we have definitely noticed a general improvement in the quality of H-bond networks since those changes – especially in the top-ranking solutions.

Before, it was not unusual for us to find a few "unrealistic" H-bond networks (usually with subtle problems in H-bond geometry) among the top-scoring solutions from a puzzle. It seemed these networks were being awarded a big bonus that did not represent a true improvement in design quality.

It makes sense that it's harder to create networks with the recent changes. But it appears that the new HBNet Objective is in fact better about awarding bonuses that reflect real improvements in solutions. (At least, the solutions look better to Foldit scientists; we won't really know about any improvements until we get to test the designs in the lab).