Global soloist scores calculated incorrectly.

[frood66]

I'm only here to say how great it is to see bootsmcgraw listed in feedback - great player - lost for no good reason imho

[Hanto]

Why was Boots lost to the community and game frood? You know the reason i am ignorant of these things

[frood66]

Is there a chance that both ranking (scoring) systems will be rectified any time soon?

Just asking.

[Bruno Kestemont]

No category scoring neither rankings are ok. Neither the personal page information.

It's quite interesting to get the righs scores for identifying the best "specialists" of the moment, and because a number of us like the competition and the game aside of feeling useful for Science

Old players are still listed in the top; in some categories, every player has 200 pts etc.

I found absurd results for:
-overall (no player listed);
-beginners: (no player listed);
-prediction: (no player listed);
-design (no player listed);
-symmetry (everybody with 200 pts, old players listed);
-CASP ROLL (no player listed);
-Electron density (no player listed);
-Hand-Folding (no player listed);
-CASP 11: (it's like a hall of fame with old players listed)
-predicted contacts: a kind of mix of old puzzles with a maximum of 400 pts/ player which doesn't look lik correct for "8 best puzzles";
-Small Molecule design: may be correct, it's not sure; may be because the number of puzzle is short
-Pilot: it seems to be correct, may be because the number of puzzle is short
-Prediction (no player listed);